Washington, D.C. Location
McNeely, Hare & War LLP
Translate Site:
5335 Wisconsin Ave, NW, Suite 440,
Washington, DC 20015
(202) 274-0214
Directions | Email
Washington, DC 20015
(202) 274-0214
Princeton, NJ Location
McNeely, Hare & War LLP
Directions | Email
12 Roszel Road, Suite C104,
Princeton, NJ 08540
(609) 240-2533Princeton, NJ 08540
Translate Site:
- Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
- US Patent Law Title 35 USC Part III Protection Patent Rights
- US Patent Law Title 35 USC Part IV Patent Cooperation Treaty PCT
- US Patent Law Title 35 USC Table of Contents United States of America
- USCAFC US Court of Appeals Judges of the Federal Circuit
- USDC Frequently Asked Questions Federal District Court US
- USDC United States District Court Overview Patent Infringement Trial
- Victor Moseley and Cathy Moseley, DBA Victor’s Little Secret, Petitioners V. Secret Catalogue, INC., Et Al.
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner V. Samara Brothers, Inc.
- Warner Jenkinson Company, INC., Petitioner V. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
- William D. Hare – Partner – Biotech & Pharma Practice Chair
- Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
- PCT Regulation Rule 6 WIPO International Patent Application DC District Columbia
- PCT Regulation Rule 7
- PCT Regulation Rule 7 WIPO International Patent DC
- PCT Regulation Tables of Contents
- PCT System Advantages
- Practice Area Overview
- Pharma/Biotech
- Professional Employment Opportunities Patent Specialist
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark Attorneys – Washington DC
- Professional Attorney Profiles
- Rebecca J. Stempien – Trademark Trial Opposition and Litigation Attorney
- Renita Rathinam
- Simana Rao – Patent Attorney
- Steven M. War, Partner & IP Litigation Practice Chair
- Recent Work Patent Trademark
- Regional Patents Via the PCT
- Representative Clients
- Resource Links
- Seminars
- Power Technology Closes on $5.5 Million Capital Commitment
- Power Technology Engages Patent Attorney Kevin J. McNeely, Esq. Washington D.C.
- The Real Test is Getting Attorneys to E-File
- Site Translations
- Sitemap
- Start-Up Companies
- Strasbourg Agreement Concerning International Patent Classification
- Thank You
- The PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II of the PCT)
- Trade Secret Licensing
- Trademark Law Treaty Geneva 1994
- Trademark Questionnaire
- Trademark Rules of Practice
- Trademark Trial and Appela Board Decisions
- Trips Agreement Part 1
- Trips Agreement Part 3 Enforcement of IP Rights
- Trips Agreement Table of Contents
- Trips Part 2
- Trips Premable
- Two Pesos, Inc., Petitioner V. Taco Cabana, Inc.
- U.S. Patent 7496468 Apparatus For Determining a Number of Data Transmissions in Sensor Network
- United States Patent 7449762 Lateral Epitaxial Gan Metal Insulator Semiconductor Device Field Effect Transistor
- US Chemical Patent 5066412 Attorney Lawyer Augusta Portland York ME Maine
- US Chemical Patent 5182038 Lubricating Oil Additive DC Lawyer Agent
- US CHEMICAL PATENT 6027634 AQUEOUS ASPHALTENE SUSPENSION LAW FIRM DC
- US Constitution of the United States
- US Patent Law Title 35 CH 12 Examination of Application
- US Patent Law Title 35 CH 14 Issue of Patent
- US Patent Law Title 35 CH 16 Design Patents
- US Patent Law Title 35 USC Part II Patentability of Inventions and Patent Grant
- Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
- Madrid Protocol List of Articles
- Microsoft V. AT&T Infringement Component Patented Product Made Sold Another Country 271(F)
- Paris Convention
- Patent Application Dielectric Resonator Filter and Multiplexer Telecommunications Technology
- Patent Design 35 USC 171 to 173
- Patent Design Law 35 USC 171
- Patent Design Law 35 USC 172
- Patent Design Law 35 USC 173
- Patent Diamond V. Chakrarabarty US Supreme Court Decision
- Patent Diamond V. Diehr US Supreme Court Decision
- PATENT EIBEL PROCESS V. MINNESOTA & ONTARIO PAPER US SUPREME COURT DECISION
- Patent Funk Bros. Seed V. Kalo Inoculant US Supreme Court Decision
- Patent Gottschalk V. Benson US Supreme Court Decision
- Patent Interference Board Opinions
- Patent Interference Law 5 USC 135
- Patent Interference Overview
- Patent Interference Practice Strategies
- Patent License Assessment – Strategy
- Patent License Royalty
- Patent Licensing and Assignment Overview Patent License Attorneys Washington DC
- Patent Mackay Radio & Telegraph V. Radio Corporation US Supreme Court Decision
- Patent Parker V. Flook US Supreme Court Decision
- Patent Prosecution Attorneys Washington, DC
- Patent Publication – Medication Delivery Device and Method Medical Surgical Apparatus
- Patent Publication Cell Culture Tool Method Interacting Substance Mechanical Apparatus
- Patent Publication Current Collector Method Improve Performance Lead-Acid Battery Technology
- Patent Publication Message Screening System and Method Block E-Mail Spam
- Patent Publication Message Screening System and Method Voice Communication Caller Telephone Blocking
- Patent Publication Method of Manufacture of Lead-Acid Battery, Electrode and Current Collector
- Patent Publication Mobile Gaming System and Method Gambling Casino Betting Wager
- Patent Publication Power Supply Assembly Electronic Electrical Apparatus
- Patent Publication Secure Communication System Satellite Patent Application
- Patent Software Diamond V. Diehr Abstract
- Patent Software MPEP Computer Related Inventions
- Patent Software Rulemaking Examination Guidelines
- PCT Application Formalities
- PCT International Patent Publication
- PCT International Patent Search Procedure
- PCT National Phase Patent Entry
- PCT Patent Application International Preliminary Examination
- PCT Patent Cooperation Treaty International WIPO Patent Application
- PCT Patents
- PCT Regulation R1 International Patent Application WIPO
- PCT Regulation Rule 10 Patent International WIPO
- PCT Regulation Rule 2 Patent International Global WIPO
- PCT Regulation Rule 3 WIPO International Patent
- PCT Regulation Rule 4 WIPO International Patent Application
- PCT Regulation Rule 5 WIPO Patent Attorney DC
- Patent Attorney Law Firm Washington, DC
- PCT International Patent
- Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
- Contract Form 73 Merger Agreement Computer Hardware Digital Circuit Electronics Patent
- Contract Form 74 Online Commerce Web-Mall Agreement Computer Network Internet Patent
- Contract Form 75 Marketing Agreement Patent Attorney Lawyer Annapolis MD Baltimore Maryland
- Contract Form 76 E-Commerce Web Site Development Patent Attorney Lawyer Rockville Gaithersburg MD Maryland
- Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO
- Cooper Industries, INC., Petitioner V. Leatherman Tool Group, INC. on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth-Circuit
- Copyright Questionnaire
- Court Decision Archive
- Court Decision Team Tires
- Dastar Corporation, Petitioner v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al.
- Design Patent Attorneys Washington DC
- Digital Equipment Corporation, Petitioner V. Desktop Direct, INC.
- Disclaimer
- eBay V. Mercexchange Patent Infringement Permanent Injunction
- Eldred ET Al. V. Ashcroft, Attorney General
- Examination of Business Method Patents
- FESTO Corporation, Petitioner V. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., LTD., Et. Al.
- Firm Overview
- Foreign, National & International Intellectual Property Law & Regulations
- German Patent Law Part 3 Procedure Before the Patent Office
- German Patent Law Part 4 The Patent Court
- German Patent Law Part 5 Proceedings Before the Patent Court
- German Patent Law Part 6 Proceeding Before the German Federal Court of Justice
- German Patent Law Part 7 Common Provisions
- German Patent Law Part 8 Legal Aid
- German Patent Law Part 9 Patent Infringement
- German Patent Law Part I
- German Patent Law Part II The Patent Office
- German Patent Law Table of Contents
- Herbert Markman and Postitek, Inc., Petitioners V. Westview Instruments, Inc. and Althon Enterprises, Inc.
- Intellectual Property Attorney Position
- Intellectual Property Litigation Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Overview
- Intellectual Property Litigation Federal Court Overview Introduction
- Intellectual Property Litigation US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Information
- International Patent Attorneys – PCT International Patent Phase
- International Trademark Attorney Filing Under the Madrid Protocol
- J.E.M. Ag. Supply, Inc., DBA Farm Advantage, Inc., Et Al. Petitioners V. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
- KP Permanent Make-Up, INC., Petitioner V. Lasting Impression I, INC., ET AL.
- KSR V. Teleflex Patent Obviousness TSM Teaching Suggestion Motivation
- Madrid Agreement
- Copyright
- Intellectual Property Litigation Introduction Patent Trademark
- Dr. Jacques Y. Roberge, Ph.D
- Dr. Sarika Singh
- Ginny Decuir – Technical Writer
- James L. Lewis – Patent Prosecutor Chemical Physical Chemistry
- Kevin McNeely – Partner – US Patent & Trademark Attorney
- German
- Japanese
- Korean
- Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
- Amazon.com, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, V. Barnesandnoble.com, INC., and Barnesabdnoble.com, LLC,
- Art Unity Patent Technology by U.S. Patent Office Classification USA
- Business Method Patents Attorney Washington DC
- Cardinal Chemical Company, Etc., Et Al., Petitioners V. Morton International, Inc.
- Chemistry – Examination of Chemical Patents and Bioletechnology Patents US Patent Attorney Washington, DC Lawyer
- College Savings Bank, Petitioner V. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board Et Al.
- Contact Us
- Contract and Licensing Agreements
- Contract Form 10 Music Sampling Agreement
- Contract Form 11 Music Video License Agreement Multimedia
- Contract Form 18 Joint Commercialization Agreement
- Contract Form 19 Artist Work-For-Hire Agreement Copyright Protection
- Contract Form 28 Confidential Disclosure Letter Agreement NDA
- Contract Form 41 Inventions Patent Agreement
- Contract Form 42 Consulting Agreement Software
- Contract Form 43 Database License Agreement Software
- Contract Form 44 Domain Name Assignment Agreement Software
- Contract Form 45 Confidentiality Agreement With Technology Consultant
- Contract Form 46 Software Development Agreement
- Contract Form 47 Website Development Agreement
- Contract Form 48 Website Hosting Agreement
- Contract Form 49 Website Linking Agreement
- Contract Form 50 Privacy Policy
- Contract Form 51 Subscriber Agreement Investor Investment
- Contract Form 52 Financing and Development Agreement Subscriber Investor
- Contract Form 53 Loan Agreement
- Contract Form 54 Credit Agreement PCT Bank Patent Inventor Borrower
- Contract Form 55 Asset Purchase Agreement PCT Patent
- Contract Form 56 Internet Service Provider Agreement PCT Patent
- Contract Form 57 Interactive Services Agreement PCT International Patent
- Contract Form 58 Master Services Agreement International PCT Patent
- Contract Form 59 Advertising Agreement PCT International Patent
- Contract Form 60 Co-Branded Marketing Agreement PCT WIPO International Patent
- Contract Form 61 Affinity Marketing Agreement PCT International WIPO Patent
- Contract Form 62 Sponsorship Agreement Worldwide Foreign Patent
- Contract Form 63 Fulfillment Agreement International Patent DC Lawyer
- Contract Form 64 Celebrity Endorsement Agreement Intellectual Property Law Patent Lawyer
- Contract Form 65 Music License Agreement
- Contract Form 66 Partnership Agreement WIPO Patent Protection US Patent Lawyer
- Contract Form 67 Featured Services Provider Agreement International Patent Protection DC Patent Attorney
- Contract Form 68 Joint Product Development Agreement District Columbia Patent Agent Global Patent Protection
- Contract Form 69 – Joint Venture Agreement US Patent Attorney USA Patent Lawyer
- Contract Form 70 Exclusive Sponsorship Agreement Patent License Intellectual Property
- Contract Form 71 Technology License Agreement Patent Inventor
- Contract Form 72 Software License Agreement US Trademark Attorney USA Trademark Lawyer
- Andrew Deschere – Patent Agent Electrical Electronics Engineer MIT
- Christopher Casieri – Partner – Patent Attorney – Princeton, New Jersey
- Chinese (Simplified)
- Chinese (Traditional)
- CNN Interviews Kevin J. McNeely on MADD V. MAIA Trademark Dispute
