PatentTrademarkCopyrightTrade SecretsBusiness Method PatentsStart-Up Companies

News & Resources

News

[12/31] Chinese software pirates get prison sentences
[12/31] Album sales plunge, digital downloads up
[12/23] Harmonic to buy Scopus for $5.62 per share

More...

Articles

Pick a Winning Name for Your Business

There's a lot of room for personal and professional creativity when choosing a business name, but there are three main considerations to keep in mind:

More...

What laws offer protection to trademark owners?

The basic rules for resolving disputes over who is entitled to use a trademark come from decisions by federal and state courts (the common law). These rules usually favor the business that first used the mark where the second use would be likely to cause customer confusion. A number of additional legal principles used to protect owners against improper use of their marks derive from federal statutes known collectively as the Lanham Act (Title 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127). And all states have statutes that govern the use and protection of marks within the state's boundaries.

More...

Case Summaries

[12/30] Acumed LLC v. Stryker Corp.
District court did not abuse its discretion in permanently enjoining defendant from selling its product after jury found willful infringement of plaintiff's valid patent. The court correctly applied the four-factor test for permanent injunctive relief, finding that: 1) plaintiff has suffered irreparable injury; 2) remedies at law were inadequate; 3) balance of hardships warranted issuance of injunctive relief; and 4) the public interest was not harmed by issuance of the permanent injunction, despite defendant's assertion that its infringing product was safer than plaintiff's product.

[12/29] In re TS Tech USA Corp.
In a patent infringement action relating to pivotally attached vehicle headrest assemblies, petition for writ of mandamus to vacate decision denying petitioner's motion to transfer venue and to direct district court to transfer case to another state is granted where: 1) petitioner met its difficult burden of establishing that the district court clearly abused its discretion in denying transfer of venue to the Southern District of Ohio; and 2) mandamus relief was appropriate.

More...

Frequently Asked Questions

How do copyrights, patents, and trademarks differ?

What are the advantages of registering a copyright?

What is "work made for hire"?

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Protecting the Intellectual Property of Entrepreneurs
HomeFirm OverviewProfessional ProfilesPractice Area OverviewFirm NewsRepresentative ClientsRecent WorkE-NewsletterNews & ResourcesLanguagesContact Us

McNeely Bodendorf LLP
1156 15th Street, NW, Suite 603
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: (202) 274-0214

Email Us
Print This Page
Home | Home | Firm Overview | Professional Profiles | Practice Area Overview | Patent | Trademark | Copyright
Trade Secrets | Business Method Patents | Start-Up Companies | Firm News | Representative Clients | Recent Work
E-Newsletter | News & Resources | Languages | Contact Us | Resource Links
© 2009 McNeely IP Law. All rights reserved. Disclaimer